Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: wenjing(at)gmail(dot)com
Cc: Ming Li <mli(at)apache(dot)org>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, shawn wang <shawn(dot)wang(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, 曾文旌 <wenjing(dot)zwj(at)alibaba-inc(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Prabhat Sahu <prabhat(dot)sahu(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, tushar <tushar(dot)ahuja(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables
Date: 2021-09-16 06:29:43
Message-ID: CAFj8pRDk4y8kynnQ7bd9pkDXLci0KwF8EjavONw_MHpGC=CQ6w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi

looks so this patch is broken again. Please, can you do rebase?

Regards

Pavel

čt 16. 9. 2021 v 8:28 odesílatel wenjing <wjzeng2012(at)gmail(dot)com> napsal:

>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dilip Kumar 2021-09-16 07:25:06 Re: Gather performance analysis
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2021-09-16 05:54:11 Re: Added schema level support for publication.