Re: shoud be get_extension_schema visible?

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: shoud be get_extension_schema visible?
Date: 2023-02-19 05:40:39
Message-ID: CAFj8pRDgKuVa_KAiVkKAETLstyD2-P=eeDcmyRXwQKnBkyuOPg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi

pá 17. 2. 2023 v 6:45 odesílatel Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
napsal:

> Hi
>
> more times I needed to get the extension's assigned namespace. There is
> already a cooked function get_extension_schema, but it is static.
>
> I need to find a function with a known name, but possibly an unknown
> schema from a known extension.
>

Here is an patch

Regards

Pavel

>
> Regards
>
> Pavel
>
>
>

Attachment Content-Type Size
public_get_extension_schema.patch text/x-patch 1.1 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2023-02-19 07:25:57 Re: Handle TEMP_CONFIG for pg_regress style tests in pg_regress.c
Previous Message shiy.fnst@fujitsu.com 2023-02-19 02:40:31 "out of relcache_callback_list slots" after multiple calls to pg_logical_slot_get_binary_changes