Re: proposal: variadic argument support for least, greatest function

so 23. 2. 2019 v 20:23 odesílatel Chapman Flack <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net>
napsal:

> On 02/23/19 13:35, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> > please, see, attached patch
>
> It is getting close, for my purposes. There is still this:
>
> >> Can the sentence added to the doc be changed to "These functions support
> >> passing parameters as an array after <literal>VARIADIC</literal>
> >> keyword."? That is, s/supports/support/ and s/a/an/. I've done that
> >> after a couple of recent patches, but it seems to be on springs.
>

fixed

>
>
> > I know so is important to understand to things, but nobody can understand
> > to all. And then it is nice, so the things just works
> >>
> >> The approach with more parsimony indoors would be to just create a few
> >> new ordinary functions, and add to the doc explaining why they are
> >> different, and that would be a patch only needing to touch a couple
> files.
> >>
> >> I have a feeling that the final decision on whether the indoor or
> outdoor
> >> parsimony matters more will be made by Tom, or another committer; I find
> >> myself seeing both sides, and not feeling insider-y enough myself to
> >> pick one.
> >
> > sure, every time it is commiter's decision.
>
>
> A part of me waits to see if another voice chimes in on the high-level
> want/don't-want question ... I think enough of the patch is ready for
> that question to be ripe, and if the answer is going to be "don't want"
> it would be ideal to know that before additional iterations of work on it.
>

sure

Regards

Pavel

> -Chap
>