Re: proposal: possibility to read dumped table's name from file

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Surafel Temesgen <surafel3000(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Subject: Re: proposal: possibility to read dumped table's name from file
Date: 2020-11-19 19:57:01
Message-ID: CAFj8pRBoZ1yY7Q_UBCiRFicKvtpxdzkuyus701A4wKe9z9d-9Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>> BTW, in your most recent patch:
>> s/empty rows/empty lines/
>> unbalanced parens: "invalid option type (use [+-]"
>>
>
> should be fixed now, thank you for check
>

minor update - fixed handling of processing names with double quotes inside

>
> Regards
>
> Pavel
>
>
>
>> @cfbot: I renamed the patch so please ignore it.
>>
>> --
>> Justin
>>
>

Attachment Content-Type Size
pg_dump-filter-option-20201119-2.patch text/x-patch 13.7 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joe Conway 2020-11-19 20:09:39 Re: Should we document IS [NOT] OF?
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2020-11-19 19:51:18 Re: proposal: possibility to read dumped table's name from file