Re: PL/pgSQL, RAISE and error context

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PL/pgSQL, RAISE and error context
Date: 2015-07-09 20:31:12
Message-ID: CAFj8pRB2ns7sGqobyLefjoOkN1UcyNz3W6fZaGu6pym9yanhzg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2015-07-09 20:08 GMT+02:00 Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>:

> On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> >
> > 2015-07-09 15:17 GMT+02:00 Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 11:28 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com
> >
> >> wrote:
> >> > Hi
> >> >
> >> > second version of this patch
> >> >
> >> > make check-world passed
> >>
> >> quickly scanning the patch, the implementation is trivial (minus
> >> regression test adjustments), and is, IMSNSHO, the right solution.
> >
> >
> > yes, it is right way - the behave of RAISE statement will be much more
> > cleaner
> >>
> >>
> >> Several of the source level comments need some minor wordsmithing and
> >> the GUCs are missing documentation. If we've got consensus on the
> >> approach, I'll pitch in on that.
> >
> > thank you
>
> revised patch attached. added GUC docs and cleaned up pg_settings
> language. Also tested patch and it works beautifully.
>
> Note, Pavel's patch does adjust default behavior to what we think is
> the "right" settings.
>

Thank you for documentation.

There is small error - default for client_min_context is error - not
notice. With this level a diff from regress tests is minimal. Default for
log_min_context should be warning.

Regards

Pavel

>
> merlin
>

Attachment Content-Type Size
min_context-20150709-02-2.patch text/x-patch 100.8 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2015-07-09 20:48:38 Re: pg_dump quietly ignore missing tables - is it bug?
Previous Message Alexander Korotkov 2015-07-09 20:10:13 Re: Waits monitoring