Re: patch: reduce overhead of execution of CALL statement in no atomic mode from PL/pgSQL

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: patch: reduce overhead of execution of CALL statement in no atomic mode from PL/pgSQL
Date: 2021-01-26 04:38:32
Message-ID: CAFj8pRAR7zJJueWZPi2JG=v1zT-oiUBqsyAfx2cizOiJnSueKA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

út 26. 1. 2021 v 4:33 odesílatel Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> napsal:

> Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > [ plpgsql-plan-cache-for-call-3.patch ]
>
> Pushed with some additional cleanup.
>

Thank you

Pavel

> It strikes me that we ought to get rid of SPI_execute_with_receiver
> (which has been added since v13) in favor of a "SPI_execute_extended"
> that shares the same options struct as SPI_execute_plan_extended.
> But I left that for tomorrow.
>
> regards, tom lane
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2021-01-26 04:46:18 Re: shared tempfile was not removed on statement_timeout
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2021-01-26 04:27:28 Re: Add SQL function for SHA1