| From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: proposal: searching in array function - array_position |
| Date: | 2015-01-24 08:48:39 |
| Message-ID: | CAFj8pRALw26BR2dmLBpU-VKRprfQ6d9x8QkyXejD41DtSTdz2Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi
with array_offsets - returns a array of offsets
Regards
Pavel
2015-01-20 21:32 GMT+01:00 Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>:
> On 1/20/15 11:12 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>
>> I am sending updated version - it allow third optional argument that
>> specify where searching should to start. With it is possible repeatably
>> call this function.
>>
>
> What happened to returning an array of offsets? I think that would be both
> easier to use than this version as well as performing better.
>
> I see you dropped multi-dimension support, but I think that's fine.
>
> --
> Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting
> Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
>
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| array_offset-03.patch | text/x-patch | 19.5 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2015-01-24 10:41:24 | Re: hung backends stuck in spinlock heavy endless loop |
| Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2015-01-24 04:16:17 | Re: Parallel Seq Scan |