Re: Proposal : Parallel Merge Join

From: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proposal : Parallel Merge Join
Date: 2017-03-07 17:00:24
Message-ID: CAFiTN-vE4Xq8pgOOc8tyNnbRd-T=ie8yP00UENDMuLC35LJOqQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 10:28 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Apart from this, there was one problem in match_unsorted_outer (in
>> v10), Basically, if inner_cheapest_total was not parallel_safe then I
>> was always getting parallel safe inner. But, we should not do anything
>> if jointype was JOIN_UNIQUE_INNER, so fixed that also.
>
> This version looks fine to me, so committed.

Thank you.

--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2017-03-07 17:04:12 Re: Patch to improve performance of replay of AccessExclusiveLock
Previous Message Robert Haas 2017-03-07 16:58:00 Re: Proposal : Parallel Merge Join