| From: | Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andreas Seltenreich <seltenreich(at)gmx(dot)de>, Piotr Stefaniak <postgres(at)piotr-stefaniak(dot)me>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [sqlsmith] Failed assertion in joinrels.c |
| Date: | 2016-08-10 04:34:44 |
| Message-ID: | CAFiTN-uOcV78Nk46YL4n+V4Hw8cGyZyDc6LnE335UKTS46VwdA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 6:49 PM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Okay, then how about ERRCODE_UNDEFINED_OBJECT? It seems to be used in
> almost similar cases.
This seems better, after checking at other places I found that for
invalid type we are using ERRCODE_UNDEFINED_OBJECT and for invalid
functions we are using ERRCODE_UNDEFINED_FUNCTION. So I have done the
same way.
Updated patch attached.
--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| cache_lookup_failure_v2.patch | application/octet-stream | 3.1 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2016-08-10 04:41:30 | Re: multivariate statistics (v19) |
| Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2016-08-10 03:03:49 | Re: dsm_unpin_segment |