Re: Parallel bitmap heap scan

From: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Rafia Sabih <rafia(dot)sabih(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: tushar <tushar(dot)ahuja(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Parallel bitmap heap scan
Date: 2017-01-13 13:06:16
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 5:47 PM, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Hello Dilip,
>> I was trying to test the performance of all the parallel query related
>> patches on TPC-H queries, I found that when parallel hash [1 ]and your
>> patch are applied then Q10 and Q14 were hanged, however, without any
>> one of these patches, these queries are running fine. Following is the
>> stack trace,
> Thanks for reporting, I will look into this.
I had setup for TPCH scale factor 5, I could reproduce the hang
reported by you with Q10. I have fixed the issue in v10 (only 0003 is
changed other patches have no change). However, after fixing this
issue it's crashing in parallel shared hash patch and call stack is
same what you have reported on parallel shared hash thread[1]


Please verify with the new patch.

Dilip Kumar

Attachment Content-Type Size
0003-parallel-bitmap-heap-scan-v10.patch application/octet-stream 44.1 KB

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2017-01-13 13:09:32 Re: Patch to implement pg_current_logfile() function
Previous Message Marko Tiikkaja 2017-01-13 11:55:58 Re: plpgsql - additional extra checks