Re: Parallel bitmap heap scan

From: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: tushar <tushar(dot)ahuja(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Parallel bitmap heap scan
Date: 2017-01-09 13:52:19
Message-ID: CAFiTN-tGfD8givDnhy_90XzG5R-RSvOr+XR+bAwAdkmtE6T4wQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 5:01 PM, tushar <tushar(dot)ahuja(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> Thanks Dilip. issue is reproducible if we uses '--enable-cassert' switch
> in the configure. We are able to reproduce it only with --enable-cassert' .

Thanks, Tushar. I have fixed it. The defect was in 0002. I have also
observed another issue related to code refactoring, Actually, there
was some code present in 0001 which supposed to be in 0003.

--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

Attachment Content-Type Size
0001-opt-parallelcost-refactoring-v8.patch application/octet-stream 13.3 KB
0002-hash-support-alloc-free-v8.patch application/octet-stream 6.2 KB
0003-parallel-bitmap-heap-scan-v8.patch application/octet-stream 44.1 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2017-01-09 14:14:14 Re: merging some features from plpgsql2 project
Previous Message Ashutosh Bapat 2017-01-09 13:36:47 Re: postgres_fdw bug in 9.6