| From: | Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | SATYANARAYANA NARLAPURAM <satyanarlapuram(at)gmail(dot)com>, shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: synchronized_standby_slots behavior inconsistent with quorum-based synchronous replication |
| Date: | 2026-03-12 11:17:31 |
| Message-ID: | CAFPTHDbrJJtaR4Jf2HNOZQVyBLJF-kq8kk=FvmeZ1rfU+Y3R5g@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Mar 8, 2026 at 4:16 AM Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Submitting a new version of the patch based on Satya's earlier work - [1].
>
> Please take a look and let us know your thoughts.
>
> [1] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAHg%2BQDfU7rOebrLDESPpHSgdiadKbpCOmBokcbmM6Gr%2BA5VobQ%40mail.gmail.com
>
Hi Ashutosh,
I was testing this patch and it seems, if the name of the slots starts
with first, say firstslot or firstsub, then the patch treats it as
FIRST 1 priority mode.
I tested with this:
synchronized_standby_slots = 'firstsub1, firstsub2'
regards,
Ajin Cherian
Fujitsu Australia
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Yura Sokolov | 2026-03-12 11:25:17 | Re: Why clearing the VM doesn't require registering vm buffer in wal record |
| Previous Message | Eduard Stepanov | 2026-03-12 11:13:38 | Re: BUG: ReadStream look-ahead exhausts local buffers when effective_io_concurrency>=64 |