Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions

From: Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions
Date: 2020-11-06 03:10:01
Message-ID: CAFPTHDZc47FQQc+CkSc6QzbEmdMaLaSX1r3WF2F=TG83vYejOA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Nov 4, 2020 at 9:31 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> Okay, so it is mentioned in the comment why we need to execute
> invalidations even when the database is not the same. So, we are
> probably good here if we are executing the invalidations whenever we
> skip to decode the prepared xact.

Updated to execute invalidations while skipping prepared transactions.
Also ran pgindent on the
source files with updated typedefs.
Attaching v17 with 1,2 and 3.

regards,
Ajin Cherian
Fujitsu Australia

Attachment Content-Type Size
v17-0001-Support-2PC-txn-base.patch application/octet-stream 39.1 KB
v17-0002-Support-2PC-txn-backend.patch application/octet-stream 30.8 KB
v17-0003-Support-2PC-test-cases-for-test_decoding.patch application/octet-stream 33.3 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message k.jamison@fujitsu.com 2020-11-06 03:44:50 RE: [Patch] Optimize dropping of relation buffers using dlist
Previous Message meission 2020-11-06 02:26:29 subscribing