Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions

From: Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions
Date: 2020-07-10 03:51:08
Message-ID: CAFPTHDZUQTa8oOthwLOpFwQP128mJOYYTbxtyV6D7Ejc60fNGw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 1:30 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

>
> > I think if the GUC is set then maybe we can bypass this check so that
> > it can try to stream every single change?
> >
>
> Yeah and probably we need to do something for the check "while
> (rb->size >= logical_decoding_work_mem * 1024L)" as well.
>
>
> I have made this change, as discussed, the regression tests seem to run
fine. I have added a debug that records the streaming for each transaction
number. I also had to bypass certain asserts
in ReorderBufferLargestTopTXN() as now we are going through the entire list
of transactions and not just picking the biggest transaction .

regards,
Ajin
Fujitsu Australia

Attachment Content-Type Size
v31-0015-TEST-guc-always-streaming-logical.patch application/octet-stream 3.0 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zhenghua Lyu 2020-07-10 04:23:04 distribute_restrictinfo_to_rels if restrictinfo contains volatile functions
Previous Message Amit Langote 2020-07-10 03:21:12 Re: [PATCH] Performance Improvement For Copy From Binary Files