Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum

From: John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Yura Sokolov <y(dot)sokolov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum
Date: 2022-10-10 05:54:50
Message-ID: CAFBsxsHDNrNSK4PDfKDArzVDEE2zozgMQZ0NbwMJmOfAC-xhbA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 12:16 PM John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
wrote:
> Thanks for that! Now I can show clear results on some aspects in a simple
way. The attached patches (apply on top of v6)

Forgot the patchset...

--
John Naylor
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

Attachment Content-Type Size
radix-v6-addendum-jcn1.tar.gz application/gzip 6.1 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bharath Rupireddy 2022-10-10 06:03:57 Re: Switching XLog source from archive to streaming when primary available
Previous Message John Naylor 2022-10-10 05:16:30 Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum