Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum

From: John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Yura Sokolov <y(dot)sokolov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum
Date: 2023-08-16 11:04:34
Message-ID: CAFBsxsE_+tJrRdo6scCZ6UjC2bpPKnMN+djOBO0G3WPuyTzZ0A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 6:53 PM John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 9:34 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
>
> > BTW cfbot reported that some regression tests failed due to OOM. I've
> > attached the patch to fix it.
>
> Seems worth doing now rather than later, so added this and squashed most
of the rest together.

This segfaults because of a mistake fixing a rebase conflict, so v40
attached.

--
John Naylor
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

Attachment Content-Type Size
v40-ART.tar.gz application/gzip 43.5 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2023-08-16 11:15:46 Re: Performance degradation on concurrent COPY into a single relation in PG16.
Previous Message Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) 2023-08-16 10:25:03 RE: [PoC] pg_upgrade: allow to upgrade publisher node