| From: | Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josef Šimánek <josef(dot)simanek(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Improvements and additions to COPY progress reporting |
| Date: | 2021-02-21 19:10:09 |
| Message-ID: | CAEze2Wjd9JQS_LjLS+cSsuF0Z28Xg4DG9cKi-XBAAjWxCtf_nA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, 20 Feb 2021 at 07:09, Bharath Rupireddy
<bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> For COPY TO the name "source_type" column and for COPY FROM the name
> "destination_type" makes sense. To have a combined column name for
> both, how about naming that column as "io_type"?
Thank you, that's way better! PFA what I believe is a finalized
patchset v9, utilizing io_type terminology instead of io_target.
With regards,
Matthias van de Meent
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v9-0001-Add-progress-reported-components-for-COPY-progres.patch | text/x-patch | 11.9 KB |
| v9-0003-Add-copy-progress-reporting-regression-tests.patch | text/x-patch | 5.1 KB |
| v9-0002-Add-backlinks-to-progress-reporting-documentation.patch | text/x-patch | 7.4 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2021-02-21 21:56:03 | Re: [PATCH] Present all committed transaction to the output plugin |
| Previous Message | Daniele Varrazzo | 2021-02-21 18:39:12 | Re: Is a connection max lifetime useful in a connection pool? |