| From: | Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | |
| Cc: | jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: SQL-level pg_datum_image_equal |
| Date: | 2026-03-25 14:46:08 |
| Message-ID: | CAEze2WjUyYhcUwzaPiQbe-xBB_knbnG8Xr_9ACL7HrGVx=Vydw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 22 Dec 2025 at 16:25, Matthias van de Meent
<boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 20 Dec 2025 at 14:15, jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > maybe Table 9.76
> > (https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/functions-info.html#FUNCTIONS-INFO-CATALOG)
> > is the right place for this function.
>
> I think table 9.3
> (https://www.postgresql.org/docs/18/functions-comparison.html#FUNCTIONS-COMPARISON-FUNC-TABLE)
> makes more sense, as this is more a compare function than one that
> exposes catalog information about the input.
Attached is v2, which adds the new function to the docs, in addition
to rebasing the patch onto master.
Kind regards,
Matthias van de Meent
Databricks (https://www.databricks.com)
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v2-0001-Add-SQL-level-datum-equality-tests.patch | application/octet-stream | 4.6 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alexandre Felipe | 2026-03-25 14:47:58 | Re: SLOPE - Planner optimizations on monotonic expressions. |
| Previous Message | Mark Dilger | 2026-03-25 14:40:23 | Re: Use CASEFOLD() internally rather than LOWER() |