Re: cleanup patches for incremental backup

From: Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: cleanup patches for incremental backup
Date: 2024-01-15 20:31:18
Message-ID: CAEze2Who3iG9QXbV9gbWp3WvuwSh5D65Dzv9ktZEyxpRb_QvkQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 15 Jan 2024 at 17:58, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jan 13, 2024 at 1:00 PM Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > I've found one more typo in the sgml:
> > summarized_pid
> > And one in a comment:
> > sumamry
> >
> > A trivial fix is attached.
>
> Thanks, committed.

Off-list I was notified that the new WAL summarizer process was not
yet added to the glossary, so PFA a patch that does that.
In passing, it also adds "incremental backup" to the glossary, and
updates the documented types of backends in monitoring.sgml with the
new backend type, too.

Kind regards,

Matthias van de Meent.

Attachment Content-Type Size
v1-0001-incremental-backups-Add-new-items-to-glossary-mon.patch application/octet-stream 4.2 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Konstantin Knizhnik 2024-01-15 20:42:10 Re: Custom explain options
Previous Message Robert Haas 2024-01-15 20:17:43 Re: Forbid the use of invalidated physical slots in streaming replication.