Re: Report planning memory in EXPLAIN ANALYZE

From: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andy Fan <zhihui(dot)fan1213(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Lepikhov Andrei <a(dot)lepikhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Report planning memory in EXPLAIN ANALYZE
Date: 2023-10-30 14:43:30
Message-ID: CAExHW5sCJX7696sF-OnugAiaXS=Ag95=-m1cSrjcmyYj8Pduuw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>
>
> David challenged something at the begining, but IIUC he also agree the
> value of patch 01 as the previous statement after discussion. Since the patch
> is mild itself, so I will mark this commitfest entry as "Ready for committer".
> Please correct me if anything is wrong.
>
Thanks Andy.

Here's rebased patches. A conflict in explain.out resolved.

--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat

Attachment Content-Type Size
0002-Report-memory-allocated-along-with-memory-u-20231030.patch text/x-patch 13.8 KB
0003-Separate-memory-context-for-planner-s-memor-20231030.patch text/x-patch 3.9 KB
0001-Report-memory-used-for-planning-a-query-in--20231030.patch text/x-patch 10.0 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2023-10-30 14:45:03 Re: trying again to get incremental backup
Previous Message Ashutosh Bapat 2023-10-30 14:36:13 Re: Not deleted mentions of the cleared path