Re: [PATCH] Fix for slow GIN index queries when "gin_fuzzy_search_limit" setting is relatively small for large tables

From: Adé <ade(dot)hey(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix for slow GIN index queries when "gin_fuzzy_search_limit" setting is relatively small for large tables
Date: 2020-04-04 00:38:50
Message-ID: CAEknJCf18JNKVDR6eT+C3b+L4BZp5sMfs74YShX+vBp7riwzLg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Great. Thanks for refactoring it further and fixing other bugs in there
(and making it more clean too)!

Regards,
Ade

On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 1:18 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> I wrote:
> > I'm inclined to back-patch this. Given how fuzzy the definition
> > of gin_fuzzy_search_limit is, it seems unlikely that anyone would
> > be depending on the current buggy behavior.
>
> And done. Thanks for the bug report and patch!
>
> regards, tom lane
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2020-04-04 00:48:09 Re: backup manifests and contemporaneous buildfarm failures
Previous Message Tom Lane 2020-04-04 00:18:49 Re: backup manifests