Re: Tracking wait event for latches

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Tracking wait event for latches
Date: 2016-10-04 19:28:12
Message-ID: CAEepm=3xpABBQiBqCV8j65a5F8FbQER=xbwzqQEb0Dpwn4vmdw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 4:59 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 8:43 PM, Michael Paquier
> <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> The rest looks good to me. Thanks for the feedback and the time!
>
> Thanks for the fixes. I committed this with an additional compile
> fix, but the buildfarm turned up a few more problems that my 'make
> check-world' didn't find. Hopefully those are fixed now, but we'll
> see.

Nitpicking: the includes in bgworker.c weren't sorted properly, and
then this patch added "pgstat.h" in the wrong position. See attached
suggestion.

--
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com

Attachment Content-Type Size
nitpicking.patch application/octet-stream 519 bytes

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2016-10-04 19:38:34 Re: Misidentification of Python shared library
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2016-10-04 19:12:19 Re: condition variables