| From: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Assert(LWLockHeldByMeInMode(lock, LW_EXCLUSIVE)) |
| Date: | 2016-06-18 03:28:18 |
| Message-ID: | CAEepm=3adR-nw+N7eY1H6Xpf3w3VEqoFtbpho2ZK=JfKCfCCPA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi hackers,
Several times now when reading, debugging and writing code I've wished
that LWLockHeldByMe assertions specified the expected mode, especially
where exclusive locking is required.
What do you think about something like the attached? See also an
example of use. I will add this to the next commitfest.
--
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| bufmgr-assert-lwlock-mode.patch | application/octet-stream | 631 bytes |
| test-lwlock-mode.patch | application/octet-stream | 1.6 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2016-06-18 03:48:21 | Re: pgsql: Try again to fix the way the scanjoin_target is used with partia |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2016-06-18 03:26:09 | Re: pgsql: Try again to fix the way the scanjoin_target is used with partia |