Re: PATCH: pgbench - option to build using ppoll() for larger connection counts

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: "Rady, Doug" <radydoug(at)amazon(dot)com>
Cc: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: PATCH: pgbench - option to build using ppoll() for larger connection counts
Date: 2018-05-17 05:23:37
Message-ID: CAEepm=38nA8ujyrd6AJt-XXjugcGYY5Tx8fgS1TvfKfR9U8hww@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 9:23 AM, Rady, Doug <radydoug(at)amazon(dot)com> wrote:
> pgbench11-ppoll-v12.patch

Hi Doug,

FYI this patch is trying and failing to use ppoll() on Windows:

https://ci.appveyor.com/project/postgresql-cfbot/postgresql/build/1.0.30

--
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2018-05-17 05:26:33 Re: postgres_fdw: Oddity in pushing down inherited UPDATE/DELETE joins to remote servers
Previous Message Amit Langote 2018-05-17 05:23:04 Re: Needless additional partition check in INSERT?