Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: Keep one postmaster monitoring pipe per process

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Marco Pfatschbacher <Marco_Pfatschbacher(at)genua(dot)de>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: Keep one postmaster monitoring pipe per process
Date: 2018-04-19 03:14:17
Message-ID: CAEepm=2xWF53-0FfH+uB4ozAuTouxrWTvG=uEE_CyhD3OSkPxQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 6:55 PM, Thomas Munro
<thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> Here's a draft patch that does that.

Here's a better one (the previous version could read past the end of
the occurred_events array).

--
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com

Attachment Content-Type Size
0001-Exit-by-default-if-postmaster-dies-v2.patch application/octet-stream 29.6 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message jian.long@i-soft.com.cn 2018-04-19 03:38:09 Is there a memory leak in commit 8561e48?
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2018-04-19 03:05:50 Re: Excessive PostmasterIsAlive calls slow down WAL redo