Re: delta relations in AFTER triggers

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>, Amit Khandekar <amit(dot)khandekar(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: delta relations in AFTER triggers
Date: 2017-04-05 00:22:38
Message-ID: CAEepm=2O+gWnCOT9OCN-Kp5Z77EkCfnqChrb8adDhdAZPCNh6A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 11:49 AM, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Worked on the docs some more and then pushed it.
>
> Nice job cutting the number of *.[ch] lines by 30 while adding support for
> the other three core PLs. :-)

Great. Thanks. I wonder if there is some way we can automatically
include code fragments in the documentation without keeping them in
sync manually.

Now it looks like I have no more excuses for putting off reading the
papers you've shared[1][2] about incremental matview algorithms!
Looking forward to helping out with the next steps in that project if
I can.

[1] http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.40.2254&rep=rep1&type=pdf
[2] http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.31.3208&rep=rep1&type=pdf

--
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Craig Ringer 2017-04-05 00:23:16 Re: Faster methods for getting SPI results (460% improvement)
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2017-04-05 00:22:34 Re: Speedup twophase transactions