Re: POC: Cleaning up orphaned files using undo logs

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: POC: Cleaning up orphaned files using undo logs
Date: 2018-11-08 03:02:39
Message-ID: CAEepm=236hkLA5+8XScLiaqRhz0YzfoJBRfmeiyFKW0Y6c8hug@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 12:42 AM Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 8:53 AM Thomas Munro
> <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> > It passes make check on Unix and Windows, though currently it's
> > failing some of the TAP tests for reasons I'm looking into (possibly
> > due to bugs in the lower level patches, not sure).
> >
> I looked into the regression failures when the tap-tests are enabled.
> It seems that we're not estimating and allocating the shared memory
> for rollback-hash tables correctly. I've added a patch to fix the
> same.

Thanks Kuntal.

--
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2018-11-08 03:13:49 Re: PostgreSQL Limits and lack of documentation about them.
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2018-11-08 02:48:19 Re: move PartitionBoundInfo creation code