Re: Fix warnings and typo in dshash

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Fix warnings and typo in dshash
Date: 2017-09-03 09:26:15
Message-ID: CAEepm=1dWsXROuSbRg8PbKLh0S=8Ou-V8sr05DxmJOF5chBxqQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Sep 3, 2017 at 6:57 PM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I am seeing below warnings (on Win7) in dshash.c
>
> 1> dshash.c
> 1>src/backend/lib/dshash.c(318): warning C4334: '<<' : result of
> 32-bit shift implicitly converted to 64 bits (was 64-bit shift
> intended?)
> 1>src/backend/lib/dshash.c(679): warning C4334: '<<' : result of
> 32-bit shift implicitly converted to 64 bits (was 64-bit shift
> intended?)
> 1>src/backend/lib/dshash.c(713): warning C4334: '<<' : result of
> 32-bit shift implicitly converted to 64 bits (was 64-bit shift
> intended?)

Thanks! That's a handy warning to have. I see that it is also
visible on the build farm:

https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_stage_log.pl?nm=caecilian&dt=2017-09-02%2019%3A30%3A30&stg=make

Aside from these 3 warnings, it looks like the other 17 are all
"warning C4005: 'HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT_64': macro redefinition". I
wonder if it would make sense to fix that too and then turn on the
MSVC equivalent of -Werror=xxx on a build farm animal...

> Attached a patch to fix the above warning.

I think it should be (size_t) 1, not UINT64CONST(1). See attached.

> I have noticed a typo in dshash.h for which a separate patch is attached.

+1

--
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com

Attachment Content-Type Size
fix_warning.patch application/octet-stream 1.1 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nikolay Shaplov 2017-09-03 09:26:46 Re: [PATCH] Move all am-related reloption code into src/backend/access/[am-name] and get rid of relopt_kind for custom AM
Previous Message Amit Khandekar 2017-09-03 07:07:25 Re: expanding inheritance in partition bound order