Re: MERGE ... RETURNING

From: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
Cc: Vik Fearing <vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org>, Gurjeet Singh <gurjeet(at)singh(dot)im>, Isaac Morland <isaac(dot)morland(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: MERGE ... RETURNING
Date: 2023-11-09 13:24:49
Message-ID: CAEZATCX2aM2jQZYPYd_1xJFNTEaH_O0Y1XHWUPv0HPjUegs2bQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, 5 Nov 2023 at 11:52, Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> OK, that's a fair point. Attached is a new version, replacing those
> parts of the implementation with a new MergingFunc node. It doesn't
> add that much more complexity, and I think the new code is much
> neater.
>

Rebased version attached, following the changes made in 615f5f6faa and
a4f7d33a90.

Regards,
Dean

Attachment Content-Type Size
support-merge-returning-v13.patch text/x-patch 105.3 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2023-11-09 13:28:28 Re: A recent message added to pg_upgade
Previous Message Dean Rasheed 2023-11-09 12:49:53 Re: Infinite Interval