| From: | Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Vik Fearing <vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org>, Gurjeet Singh <gurjeet(at)singh(dot)im>, Isaac Morland <isaac(dot)morland(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: MERGE ... RETURNING |
| Date: | 2024-02-29 19:24:21 |
| Message-ID: | CAEZATCU513y1V+=xGP=JjPvJLkxHR+0wyHqb55Lzudo+ycjoEQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Attached is a rebased version on top of 5f2e179bd3 (support for MERGE
into views), with a few additional tests to confirm that MERGE ...
RETURNING works for views as well as tables.
I see that this patch was discussed at the PostgreSQL Developers
Meeting. Did anything new come out of that discussion?
Regards,
Dean
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| support-merge-returning-v16.patch | text/x-patch | 110.4 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2024-02-29 19:47:12 | Re: RangeTblEntry.inh vs. RTE_SUBQUERY |
| Previous Message | Phil Florent | 2024-02-29 19:12:02 | RE: Remove AIX Support (was: Re: Relation bulk write facility) |