| From: | Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kääriäinen Anssi <anssi(dot)kaariainen(at)thl(dot)fi> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: REVIEW: pg_stat_statements with query tree based normalization |
| Date: | 2012-01-21 02:16:34 |
| Message-ID: | CAEYLb_Wr6xpHh6pQu=ZYVE9QeG+H3mjFSFHXqzWoCg_PEKTisQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 21 January 2012 00:24, Kääriäinen Anssi <anssi(dot)kaariainen(at)thl(dot)fi> wrote:
> I did not see any noticeable difference in runtimes with pg_stat_statements installed or uninstalled (as extension).
> Not tested on master without the patch at all.
>
> Overall the feature seems to be really useful.
Thanks for taking the time to review the patch!
I am going to produce another revision in response to feedback already
received. I intend to outline the steps that it will take to resolve
some outstanding issues in the next day or so. It would be nice if you
could take a look at the revised patch that is ultimately produced.
Should I keep you posted?
--
Peter Geoghegan http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2012-01-21 03:13:56 | Re: Group commit, revised |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2012-01-21 01:53:33 | Re: Should I implement DROP INDEX CONCURRENTLY? |