Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: xlog location arithmetic

From: Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: xlog location arithmetic
Date: 2012-01-17 14:46:07
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 20 December 2011 10:27, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> Doing it in numeric should be perfectly fine. The only real reason to
> pick int8 over in this context would be performance, but it's not like
> this is something that's going to be called in really performance
> critical paths...

FYI, my group commit patch has a little macro, in the spirit of
XLByteAdvance, to get the delta between two LSNs in bytes as an

Peter Geoghegan
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2012-01-17 15:01:23
Subject: psql \timing vs failed statements
Previous:From: Peter GeogheganDate: 2012-01-17 14:35:28
Subject: Re: Group commit, revised

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group