| From: | Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: xlog location arithmetic |
| Date: | 2012-01-17 14:46:07 |
| Message-ID: | CAEYLb_WCTJKXV9UyJ9RgkMHH9aYid0NxmVEcbUE0esDB5nr8zA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 20 December 2011 10:27, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> Doing it in numeric should be perfectly fine. The only real reason to
> pick int8 over in this context would be performance, but it's not like
> this is something that's going to be called in really performance
> critical paths...
FYI, my group commit patch has a little macro, in the spirit of
XLByteAdvance, to get the delta between two LSNs in bytes as an
uint64.
--
Peter Geoghegan http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2012-01-17 15:01:23 | psql \timing vs failed statements |
| Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2012-01-17 14:35:28 | Re: Group commit, revised |