On 4 December 2011 19:17, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I have not done any performance testing on this patch, but it might be
> interesting to check it with the same test cases Peter's been using.
I've attached a revision of exactly the same benchmark run to get the
results in results_server.ods .
You'll see very similar figures to results_server.ods for HEAD and for
my patch, as you'd expect. I think the results speak for themselves. I
maintain that we should use specialisations - that's where most of the
benefit is to be found.
Peter Geoghegan http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tomas Vondra||Date: 2011-12-05 00:16:20|
|Subject: Re: why local_preload_libraries does require a separate
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2011-12-04 23:06:01|
|Subject: Re: why local_preload_libraries does require a separate directory ? |