| From: | Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pgsql: Revert "commit_delay" change; just add comment that we don't hav |
| Date: | 2012-08-15 01:22:05 |
| Message-ID: | CAEYLb_VL89Mp9yZ5dph2i8OijdXZGLH_kCEGzHwO=RWoe3Kdmw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On 14 August 2012 21:26, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> Revert "commit_delay" change; just add comment that we don't have
> a microsecond specification.
I think that if we eventually decide to change the name of
commit_delay for 9.3 (you previously suggested that that might be
revisited), it will be reasonable to have the new GUC in units of
milliseconds. After all, we've already been switching to milliseconds
across various statistics views, including pg_stat_statements.
--
Peter Geoghegan http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2012-08-15 03:21:30 | pgsql: Add doc example of restricting large object trigger firing to on |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2012-08-14 22:49:15 | pgsql: Stamp 8.3.20. |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2012-08-15 02:57:08 | Re: TRUE/FALSE vs true/false |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2012-08-14 23:19:25 | Re: superusers are members of all roles? |