| From: | Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Shlok Kyal <shlok(dot)kyal(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com>, SATYANARAYANA NARLAPURAM <satyanarlapuram(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: synchronized_standby_slots behavior inconsistent with quorum-based synchronous replication |
| Date: | 2026-06-16 10:42:43 |
| Message-ID: | CAE9k0Pko8+wnY5rr52q92NXyXrfDLqnn5f9TiUDSXbXGX_mpEA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 16, 2026 at 12:09 PM Shlok Kyal <shlok(dot)kyal(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> I checked the CFbot and saw the test was failing [1].
>
> It is failing for the test:
> not ok 4 - guc_privs 171 ms
>
Thanks for reporting this. The attached patches address the issue and
also incorporate the feedback from Shevta in [1].
--
With Regards,
Ashutosh Sharma.
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| 0003-Add-FIRST-N-and-N-.-priority-syntax-to-synchronized_.patch | application/octet-stream | 21.5 KB |
| 0002-Add-ANY-N-semantics-to-synchronized_standby_slots.patch | application/octet-stream | 50.6 KB |
| 0001-Refactor-syncrep-parsing-to-represent-bare-standby-l.patch | application/octet-stream | 3.2 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Nisha Moond | 2026-06-16 10:44:09 | Re: Support EXCEPT for TABLES IN SCHEMA publications |
| Previous Message | Dilip Kumar | 2026-06-16 10:41:55 | Re: Proposal: Conflict log history table for Logical Replication |