| From: | Alexandre Felipe <o(dot)alexandre(dot)felipe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Zsolt Parragi <zsolt(dot)parragi(at)percona(dot)com>, Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: SLOPE - Planner optimizations on monotonic expressions. |
| Date: | 2026-03-27 09:29:03 |
| Message-ID: | CAE8JnxOcnzLFDgPTBZDhKG9bsSemHrUJ6p-jKgM-NJ8bvzCFQg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Mar 27, 2026 at 8:47 AM Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
> I don't know. I haven't looked at the patches themselves in any
> detail. I was merely replying to a specific question about
> monotonicity with respect to a particular data type.
>
> However, my impression from reading this thread is that the patches
> haven't had a great deal of in-depth review yet, there are still a
> number of design ideas that people might wish to explore in more
> detail, it probably needs more careful analysis to verify correctness,
> and more testing. That makes me think that it's not feasible to get
> anything committable in less than a week, and it would be better to
> defer this.
Thank you for your feedback, either way I am happy that at least
now it received some attention.
I am testing an iterative single variable/expression and to find the
simplest expression x that is the cause of all the variation in the
pathkey expression, saving this in the plan info, and thus, reduce
the per index work.
Regards,
Alexandre
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2026-03-27 09:45:56 | Re: Clean up NamedLWLockTranche stuff |
| Previous Message | shveta malik | 2026-03-27 09:23:39 | Re: Skipping schema changes in publication |