Re: [PATCH] Rename pg_switch_xlog to pg_switch_wal

From: Vladimir Rusinov <vrusinov(at)google(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Rename pg_switch_xlog to pg_switch_wal
Date: 2016-12-15 11:23:26
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 11:51 PM, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com
> wrote:

> > On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 4:07 PM, Peter Eisentraut
> > <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> > Others will follow later in separate patches. Or is it preferred to have
> one
> > huge patch submitted?
> Please yes. One change makes little sense.

Ack. I was not sure what patch size is preferred here. Will continue with a
patch in original thread later.

Thanks for feedback!

Vladimir Rusinov
Storage SRE, Google Ireland

Google Ireland Ltd.,Gordon House, Barrow Street, Dublin 4, Ireland
Registered in Dublin, Ireland
Registration Number: 368047

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Craig Ringer 2016-12-15 12:06:30 Re: Logical Replication WIP
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2016-12-15 10:28:04 Re: pg_basebackups and slots