Re: [BUG?] check_exclusion_or_unique_constraint false negative

From: Mihail Nikalayeu <mihailnikalayeu(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Subject: Re: [BUG?] check_exclusion_or_unique_constraint false negative
Date: 2025-05-18 14:36:00
Message-ID: CADzfLwW61K09Q8HnQ6zO+QHD2oHBmm5VmZbHa19=ZkMMX_Vcow@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hello, everyone!

Rebased + fix for compilation due the new INEJCTION_POINT signature.

Best regards,
Mikhail.

Attachment Content-Type Size
v6-0001-Add-an-isolation-test-to-reproduce-a-dirty-snapsh.patch application/octet-stream 5.8 KB
v6-0002-Fix-btree-index-scan-concurrency-issues-with-dirt.patch application/octet-stream 9.7 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sadeq Dousti 2025-05-18 14:44:40 Re: Possible regression in PG18 beta1
Previous Message fkfk000 2025-05-18 13:04:13 To make pg_dump and pg_restore parallel in processing limited number of LOs