Re: XMAX_LOCK_ONLY and XMAX_COMMITTED (fk/multixact code)

From: Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>, Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Schneider (AWS), Jeremy" <schnjere(at)amazon(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: XMAX_LOCK_ONLY and XMAX_COMMITTED (fk/multixact code)
Date: 2022-10-21 00:16:56
Message-ID: CADkLM=dOg9vYQKjpxfKqjsm1dLegNm=xO0Z_ptth4LAk9Bd-9Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 2:32 PM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:

> Here is a rebased patch for cfbot.
>
>
>
Applies, passes make check world.

Patch is straightforward, but the previous code is less so. It purported to
set XMAX_COMMITTED _or_ XMAX_INVALID, but never seemed to un-set
XMAX_COMMITTED, was that the source of the double-setting?

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2022-10-21 00:58:03 Re: Patch proposal: make use of regular expressions for the username in pg_hba.conf
Previous Message Runqi Tian 2022-10-20 20:53:51 Re: Testing DDL Deparser