Re: [POC] A better way to expand hash indexes.

On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 10:55 PM, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> wrote:
> It does apply with fuzz on 2b32ac2, so it looks like c11453c and
> subsequent commits are the cause. They represent a fairly substantial
> change to hash indexes by introducing WAL logging so I think you should
> reevaluate your patches to be sure they still function as expected.

Thanks, David here is the new improved patch I have also corrected the
pageinspect's test output. Also, added notes in README regarding the
new way of adding bucket pages efficiently in hash index. I also did
some more tests pgbench read only and read write;
There is no performance impact due to the patch. The growth of index
size has become much efficient as the numbers posted in the initial
proposal mail.

--
Thanks and Regards
Mithun C Y
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com