| From: | Mithun Cy <mithun(dot)cy(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: POC: Cache data in GetSnapshotData() |
| Date: | 2017-07-10 04:43:56 |
| Message-ID: | CAD__OugTRzzdb1543EU+-Q-UrhvOXsBCk9by=13fbQPiZxwAWA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 12:13 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I think that we really shouldn't do anything about this patch until
> after the CLOG stuff is settled, which it isn't yet. So I'm going to
> mark this Returned with Feedback; let's reconsider it for 9.7.
I am updating a rebased patch have tried to benchmark again could see
good improvement in the pgbench read-only case at very high clients on
our cthulhu (8 nodes, 128 hyper thread machines) and power2 (4 nodes,
192 hyper threads) machine. There is some issue with base code
benchmarking which is somehow not consistent so once I could figure
out what is the issue with that I will update
--
Thanks and Regards
Mithun C Y
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| Cache_data_in_GetSnapshotData_POC_02.patch | application/octet-stream | 8.4 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI | 2017-07-10 05:09:24 | Re: hash index on unlogged tables doesn't behave as expected |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2017-07-10 04:11:44 | Re: [PATCH] Minor typo in the source repository documentation |