| From: | Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Maciek Sakrejda <msakrejda(at)truviso(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>, Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreak(at)officenet(dot)no>, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: GIT move |
| Date: | 2012-02-07 00:50:09 |
| Message-ID: | CADK3HHKYDeTfekAKcZFnjs6n5H15eGeZ6fuR38LNF9yeUvP5Xw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 7:47 PM, Maciek Sakrejda <msakrejda(at)truviso(dot)com> wrote:
>>> Did this happen ?
>>>
>>
>> Not completely. I'm most of the way through it, but was not able to
>> finish last night. I will complete the move today.
>
> Great to hear; please let me know if you hit any issues with the
> transition scripts.
>
> Also, vaguely on this topic, I'm not sure if there's a formal plan for
> methods of accepting patches (e.g., via github pull requests), but I
> highly recommend that all patches be required to be rebased against
> trunk/master, resulting in fast-forward merges into the main tree.
> This makes history much simpler to follow (no merge nodes) without a
> significant downside.
>
Currently the main project still requires a context patch as well
Dave Cramer
dave.cramer(at)credativ(dot)ca
http://www.credativ.ca
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Maciek Sakrejda | 2012-02-07 00:57:20 | Re: GIT move |
| Previous Message | Maciek Sakrejda | 2012-02-07 00:47:27 | Re: GIT move |