From: | Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov(dot)vladimir(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Fredrik Jonson <fredrik(at)jonson(dot)org>, List <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Release for 9.5 |
Date: | 2015-11-13 14:28:17 |
Message-ID: | CADK3HH+ivxqe1kzBShk_XZjwVjYWcDznUDNtC9=TbexO6ZYZ1A@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
On 13 November 2015 at 09:21, Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov(dot)vladimir(at)gmail(dot)com
> wrote:
> > If nothing else, having the version number in the artifact name makes it
> easy
> >to determine which version is used and that your app does not have
> inconsistent
>
> Fredrik, you mean "build artifact should include version like
> pgjdbc-10.20.30.jar", don't you?
>
>
I think the above clarifies it. The jar does need to be numbered; correct ?
That being said we will have to start with 10 as to distance ourselves from
postgres, however I do imagine
that at some point postgres will release version 10 and we will clash
again...
Dave Cramer
davec(at)postgresintl(dot)com
www.postgresintl.com
>
> Vladimir
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-jdbc mailing list (pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-jdbc
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Vladimir Sitnikov | 2015-11-13 14:29:42 | Re: Release for 9.5 |
Previous Message | Vladimir Sitnikov | 2015-11-13 14:21:31 | Re: Release for 9.5 |