Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum

On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 1:08 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 12:39 PM John Naylor
> <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 1:17 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 6:00 PM John Naylor
> > > <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Attached is a rebase to fix conflicts from recent commits.
> > >
> > > I have reviewed v22-0022* patch and I have some comments.
> > >
> > > 1.
> > > >It also changes to the column names max_dead_tuples and num_dead_tuples and to
> > > >show the progress information in bytes.
> > >
> > > I think this statement needs to be rephrased.
> >
> > Could you be more specific?
>
> I mean the below statement in the commit message doesn't look
> grammatically correct to me.
>
> "It also changes to the column names max_dead_tuples and
> num_dead_tuples and to show the progress information in bytes."
>

I've changed the commit message in the v23 patch. Please check it.
Other comments are also incorporated in the v23 patch. Thank you for
the comments!

Regards,

--
Masahiko Sawada
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com