Re: [HACKERS] Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers

From: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers
Date: 2018-03-29 03:44:05
Message-ID: CAD21AoC-ed4f8mbD=0uR7trFY3Uaue_q2TC6jQNnZK7Ptvi9Ag@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 2:27 AM, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> wrote:
> On 2/27/18 2:21 AM, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
>>
>> Hmm, although I've thought concern in case where we don't consider
>> local xids of un-resolved fdwxact in GetOldestXmin, I could not find
>> problem. Could you share your concern if you have? I'll try to find a
>> possibility based on it.
>
> It appears that this entry should be marked Waiting on Author so I have
> done that.
>
> I also think it may be time to move this patch to the next CF.
>

I agree to move this patch to the next CF.

Regards,

--
Masahiko Sawada
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2018-03-29 03:49:02 Re: Parallel Aggregates for string_agg and array_agg
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2018-03-29 02:48:27 Re: PostgreSQL's handling of fsync() errors is unsafe and risks data loss at least on XFS