Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: bghinter process

From: Aidan Van Dyk <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <kevin(dot)grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: bghinter process
Date: 2011-12-21 20:29:51
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:

> But, well, tuples that are succesfully hinted need no more hint bits.

Not only do they need no more hinting, they also allow the next
client-serving process that hits it avoid the clog lookup to determine
the hint.


Aidan Van Dyk                                             Create like a god,
aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca                                       command like a king,                                   work like a slave.

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2011-12-21 21:17:50
Subject: Re: CLOG contention
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2011-12-21 20:16:39
Subject: Re: RangeVarGetRelid()

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group