| From: | John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: WIP: Avoid creation of the free space map for small tables |
| Date: | 2019-02-23 08:01:11 |
| Message-ID: | CACPNZCs9K0Kre+_iCY+WJQmBq69f0Bo-7qScC7r7uy_cKWEdpw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 3:59 AM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> The reason for not pushing much on making the test pass for
> nonstandard block sizes is that when I tried existing tests, there
> were already some failures.
FWIW, I currently see 8 failures (attached).
--
John Naylor https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| jcn-16blk-regress.diffs | application/octet-stream | 31.0 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | John Naylor | 2019-02-23 08:13:21 | Re: Why don't we have a small reserved OID range for patch revisions? |
| Previous Message | John Naylor | 2019-02-23 07:54:18 | Re: WIP: Avoid creation of the free space map for small tables |