| From: | jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Paul Jungwirth <pj(at)illuminatedcomputing(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: SQL:2011 application time |
| Date: | 2023-12-06 13:22:07 |
| Message-ID: | CACJufxF2HMBZJ-LV5BTooRf-OPMj9RBwFoLxS0ThVTc14bX=4w@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Dec 3, 2023 at 2:11 AM Paul Jungwirth
<pj(at)illuminatedcomputing(dot)com> wrote:
>
> v19 patch series attached, rebased to a11c9c42ea.
>
this TODO:
* TODO: It sounds like FOR PORTION OF might need to do something here too?
based on comments on ExprContext. I refactor a bit, and solved this TODO.
tring to the following TODO:
// TODO: Need to save context->mtstate->mt_transition_capture? (See
comment on ExecInsert)
but failed.
I also attached the trial, and also added the related test.
You can also use the test to check portion update with insert trigger
with "referencing old table as old_table new table as new_table"
situation.
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v1-0001-set eval targetrange in per-output-tuple context.patch | text/x-patch | 1.4 KB |
| v1-0001-trying-to-save-mt_transition_capture-while-ExecIn.patch | text/x-patch | 10.8 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2023-12-06 13:25:16 | Re: Partial aggregates pushdown |
| Previous Message | Anthonin Bonnefoy | 2023-12-06 13:20:37 | Re: Possible segfault when sending notification within a ProcessUtility hook |