Re: Constraint documentation

From: Lætitia Avrot <laetitia(dot)avrot(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Constraint documentation
Date: 2018-06-25 15:45:37
Message-ID: CAB_COdiKFs=HbKmrdHVK1sbKy=8GYKaa1WPN8o1GjuzAZnOT_A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hello,

Ok, I corrected the patch as suggested. I hope I did it right.

Have a nice day,

Lætitia

Le lun. 25 juin 2018 à 16:02, Lætitia Avrot <laetitia(dot)avrot(at)gmail(dot)com> a
écrit :

> Thanks!
> I'll correct the patch ASAP including your modifications.
>
> Le sam. 23 juin 2018 à 19:15, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> a
> écrit :
>
>>
>> Hello lætitia,
>>
>> My 0.02 € to try to simplify the suggested documentation.
>>
>> > Check constraint were not
>>
>> are not
>>
>> > designed to enforce business rules across tables.
>>
>> > Avoid using check constraints with function accessing to other tables
>>
>> accessing other tables (no "to")
>>
>> > and prefer triggers instead (please refer to <xref linkend="triggers"/>
>> > for more information about triggers).
>>
>> ... and use <xref linkend="triggers"/> instead.
>>
>> > PostgreSQL won't prevent you from doing so,
>>
>> Although PostgreSQL ... so,
>>
>> > but be aware you might encounter difficulties to restore dumps
>> > (generated with pg_dump or pg_dumpall) if you do.
>>
>> beware that dumps generated by <application>pg_*<...> or <...> may be
>> hard
>> to restore because of such checks, as the underlying dependencies are not
>> taken into account.
>>
>> --
>> Fabien.
>
>
>
> --
> *Think! Do you really need to print this email ? *
> *There is no Planet B.*
>

--
*Think! Do you really need to print this email ? *
*There is no Planet B.*

Attachment Content-Type Size
check_constraint_accross_table_note_v2.patch text/x-patch 903 bytes

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gilles Darold 2018-06-25 15:50:40 Re: [PATCH] Include application_name in "connection authorized" log message
Previous Message Jeremy Finzel 2018-06-25 15:37:18 Some pgq table rewrite incompatibility with logical decoding?