| From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Replication docs update |
| Date: | 2012-03-21 11:01:34 |
| Message-ID: | CABUevExsu75p-gVuY1ss9d9GQoTVcEHz0cJ7Lr1_AzJkP5QGVg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 22:26, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> Our chapter, "Comparison of Different Solutions", needs an update to use
> our new streaming replication terminology, and an update to mention the
> synchronous option.
>
> Patch attached. I would like to apply it to head and 9.1.
Is it really a good idea to remove the name "hot standby" where you've
done so? It's a term that's pretty well set by now. Maybe instad "hot
standby using transaction log replication" instead of taking it away
completely?
(And i'm sure Thom will find a bunch of typos, but there is no way
around that I think..)
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2012-03-21 15:44:38 | Re: Replication docs update |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2012-03-20 21:26:43 | Replication docs update |